This article is interesting because it explains how enclosed
beaches which are a popular location that families visit annually are hot spots
of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) pollution that emerge from point sources (sewage
outfalls and storm drains) and nonpoint sources (decaying vegetation and runoff
from drains). The tradeoff is that these enclosed beaches were established to protect
against winds and waves; however, it has been analyzed that these beaches are
more polluted than beaches impacted by storm drain outlets or along open
coastlines. Hence, the investigators focused on the enclosed beaches in Newport
Bay, Southern California and investigated the impact of urban irrigation runoff
from storm drains. To perform their study, they reported the concentrations of
FIB in irrigation runoff, identified spatiotemporal patterns of nearshore FIB
and salinity, and evaluated the role of tides, winds, turbulence, and buoyancy
on FIB mixing and transport. They concluded that the best option to improve
beach water quality in Newport Bay and other urban-impacted enclosed beaches
are by outdoor water conservation and urban retrofits that minimize the volume
of dry and wet weather runoff entering the local storm drain system. Managers
and researchers focused on improving water quality at enclosed beaches worldwide
would find this study useful.
Reference
M. A. Rippy, R. Stein, B. F. Sanders, K. Davis, K. McLaughlin, J. F. Skinner, J. Kappeler, and S. B. Grant. 2014. Small drains, big problems: the impact of dry weather runoff on shoreline water quality at enclosed beaches. Environmental science technology. 48:14168-14177.
No comments:
Post a Comment